telemark skiingbackcountry skiingPacific NorthwestWashington and Oregonweather linksThe Yuki AwardsMt. Rainier and Mt. Adams
Turns All Year
www.turns-all-year.com
  Help | Search | Login | Register
Turns All Year Trip Reports
Backcountry Skiing and Snowboarding

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
05/27/17, 02:57 AM

Solar Halo over Tahoma
on TAY home page
 
Trip Reports Sponsor
American Alpine Institute
American Alpine Institute
Turns All Year Trip Reports
(1) Viewing these pages constitutes your acceptance of the Terms of Use.
(2) Disclaimer: the accuracy of information here is unknown, use at your own risk.
(3) Trip Report monthly boards: only actual trip report starts a new thread.
(4) Keep it civil and constructive - that is the norm here.
 
FOAC Snow
Info Exchange


NWAC Avalanche
Forecast
+  Turns All Year Trip Reports
|-+  2003 Backcountry Trip Reports
| |-+  July-August 2003 Backcountry Trip Reports
| | |-+  August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
:
« previous next »
Pages: [1] | Go Down Print
Author Topic: August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)  (Read 15943 times)
Paul Belitz
Member
Offline

Posts: 409


WWW
August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
« on: 08/03/03, 04:25 PM »

Sky, Jeff, Dave, Amar, and I skied Baker today via the Squak/Easton. Decent snow on the headwall, but lower down hard, 6in runnels provided nasty survival skiing. The last 1500 feet to camp were the best corn I've skied all year. It was fun.
« Last Edit: 08/03/03, 06:14 PM by pbelitz » Logged
markharf
Member
Offline

Posts: 604


Re: August DAY, 2003, LOCATION
« Reply #1 on: 08/03/03, 04:50 PM »

Thanks for the report.  Where was your camp?  In other words, where was the good corn?    Surely not on the Easton?  Maybe down low on the Squak?

Mark
Logged
skykilo
Member
Offline

Posts: 768


WWW
Re: August DAY, 2003, LOCATION
« Reply #2 on: 08/03/03, 04:50 PM »

Ah ha, good to get those August turns, and even enjoyable ones at that!  It's too bad we couldn't summit earlier, with more time the Park Headwall may have been tempting, eh?  Good skiing, Paul...
Logged
skykilo
Member
Offline

Posts: 768


WWW
Re: August DAY, 2003, LOCATION
« Reply #3 on: 08/03/03, 04:55 PM »

Mark, the good skiing is down low on the Squak, as you might have guessed.  I have never seen it without quality snow just above the gullies.  Scott Paul? (the immediate right) from Schreiber Meadows TH, and then let your instincts guide you.
Logged
markharf
Member
Offline

Posts: 604


Re: August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
« Reply #4 on: 08/03/03, 06:37 PM »

Thanks, Sky.  I've seen poor quality snow on the Squak...in early October.  Glad to hear it's surviving the heat wave in good shape.
Logged
Amar Andalkar
Member
Offline

Posts: 1198


WWW
Re: August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
« Reply #5 on: 08/07/03, 12:36 PM »

I figured I would add a few more details plus a photo. Our camp was located on a large flat beside a major waterfall at about 5800 ft. From the first major creek crossing at 5100 ft on the Scott Paul trail, the most direct way is to follow the creek right to the waterfall (we followed a moraine ridge just west of this). We skied right to/from our campsite.

As for the route itself, the Squak Glacier is in OK condition crevasse-wise for August, we needed to belay only a single crossing during the descent (Sky schussed it unroped, the rest of us were belayed). We also roped up for short sections during the ascent, David and I contoured west to join the Easton Glacier climbing route while the others followed the Squak to Sherman Crater. Both rope teams left the ropes at the crater rim and climbed the upper Easton unroped (a few obvious cracks are opening here on the headwall). The lower Easton below 8400 ft is heavily crevassed, it would not make a very good ski route right now (Squak is much better).

As for the snow, I don't want to rain on the parade, but realistically the snow wasn't THAT great. I'd have to say it was only OK at best, and never very smooth even on the lower face below 7000 ft (certainly it was smooth compared to the deep runnels between 7000 and 9000). It was pretty good and certainly fun, but I've skied better corn on at least a dozen trips in June and July this year. I just don't want others to go to the Squak with unreasonable expectations after reading the above reports, and then be disappointed. As long as your expectations are reasonable, a trip here now will be worthwhile and fun.

This photo shows us skiing down near 7000 ft on the Squak Glacier, with Sherman Peak above and the summit dome at upper left.
Click here for a double-size version of this photo.


Logged

Paul Belitz
Member
Offline

Posts: 409


WWW
Re: August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
« Reply #6 on: 08/07/03, 12:45 PM »

Hey Amar, do you have any more photos?

I thought the lower 1500 feet were great; then again, I haven't skied Baker before, so I don't know how good it can get. As you said, the runnels were not very enjoyable. Oh, well, it was still a nice trip. And in August, I'll take what I can get. Smiley
Logged
skykilo
Member
Offline

Posts: 768


WWW
Re: August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
« Reply #7 on: 08/08/03, 06:28 AM »

That's right everybody, like Amar said, the skiing sucked.   It was terrible.  Don't go to Baker.  Everybody, move to Colorado!
Logged
Paul Belitz
Member
Offline

Posts: 409


WWW
Re: August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
« Reply #8 on: 08/08/03, 08:42 AM »

I heard that Glacier peak is also not skiiable. So don't go up there either.  Grin
Logged
David_Coleman
Member
Offline

Posts: 379


Re: August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
« Reply #9 on: 08/09/03, 04:19 AM »

Yes, if you're looking for enjoyable skiing, avoid Coleman-Deming, Squak, Boulder-Park Cleaver on Baker and Sulphide Glacier on Shuksan.  I recommend you head south  Grin
Logged
skykilo
Member
Offline

Posts: 768


WWW
Re: August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
« Reply #10 on: 08/11/03, 03:51 AM »

Yeah, it's too bad we live in Seattle.  I think Shasta is the place to be.  Oh yeah, and Lassen!  You can practically drive to the top!
Logged
Paul Belitz
Member
Offline

Posts: 409


WWW
Re: August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
« Reply #11 on: 08/11/03, 04:45 PM »

Lassen can actually be enjoyable for us mortals, though...
Logged
alpentalcorey
Member
Offline

Posts: 355


Re: August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
« Reply #12 on: 08/12/03, 07:15 AM »

What's this?  Is there dissing of Lassen & Shasta going on?  The top of the NE face of Lassen was measured to be a respectable 48 degrees, and Shasta is so Shasterriffic that it needs no defense.

Having just watched Gangs of New York, maybe the best way to settle this would be an old fashioned street brawl.  
Logged
skykilo
Member
Offline

Posts: 768


WWW
Re: August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
« Reply #13 on: 08/12/03, 07:27 AM »

I'll be coming over with fresh can of whoop-ass directly, AC... Angry Wink
Logged
Paul Belitz
Member
Offline

Posts: 409


WWW
Re: August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
« Reply #14 on: 08/12/03, 07:38 AM »

I like the sound of a brawl....Maybe Jeff will join in, too! Grin
Logged
Paul Belitz
Member
Offline

Posts: 409


WWW
Re: August 3, 2003, Easton/Squak (Baker)
« Reply #15 on: 08/17/03, 12:40 PM »

TR and pictures here: http://students.washington.edu/pbelitz/BakerAugust03.html
Logged
Pages: [1] | Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



Login with username, password and session length

Thank you to our sponsors!
click to visit our sponsor: Feathered Friends
Feathered Friends
click to visit our sponsor: Marmot Mountain Works
Marmot Mountain Works
click to visit our sponsor: Second Ascent
Second Ascent
click to visit our sponsor: American Alpine Institute
American Alpine Institute
click to visit our sponsor: Pro Guiding Service
Pro Guiding Service
Contact turns-all-year.com

Turns All Year Trip Reports ©2001-2010 Turns All Year LLC. All Rights Reserved

The opinions expressed in posts are those of the poster and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Trip Reports administrators or Turns All Year LLC


Turns All Year Trip Reports | Powered by SMF 1.0.6.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.