- Posts: 69
- Thank you received: 2
March 16th, 2020 ALPENTAL Uphill Travel
- Gib
- [Gib-WSDOT]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
We are getting a bunch of questions already about uphill travel policy during this "intermission" in our season. Snow Safety, Maintenance, and hill crews have all agreed that we will continue status quo for at least this week. That means it gets even better at West, Central and East because we won't have groomers and winch lines to watch out for. At Alpental, we will try and take advantage of some daylight this week and work on just those things. We have some new winch infrastructure that hasn't been implemented yet and needs both more work and more testing. We also have heavy equipment to move both up and down the slopes and that can only be done with winches. So we will leave Alpental closed this week to uphill travel while the resort is shut down and make a commitment to you to do this week-by-week. I anticipate one to two weeks and we will either open back up for some lift-served laps, or conversely, try to increase public access for you in some way. Thanks for your support -Gib/
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Enzolola
- [Enzolola]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tomd
- [tomd]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 8
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tele.skier
- [tele.skier]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 97
- Thank you received: 0
ÂThat means it gets even better at West, Central and East because we won't have groomers and winch lines to watch out for.
That's not a clear answer to me. So, are we allowed to skin inbounds at west, central, and hyack?
At Alpental, snip,... So we will leave Alpental closed this week to uphill travel while the resort is shut down and make a commitment to you to do this week-by-week. I anticipate one to two weeks and we will either open back up for some lift-served laps, or conversely, try to increase public access for you in some way. Thanks for your support -Gib/
thanks for the heads up on alpental, Gib.
************************
So, to update the answer to my own question because Gib's comment didn't address the status of the hyack, central, and west, I went an took a look at the Summit website which said:
MARCH 15, 2020 | 2:45PM
Alpental Restriction Status
Uphill travel restrictions REMAIN ACTIVE. These restrictions will remain in place through at least Friday, March 20, 2020. We will reevalutate these restrictions at that time. Uphill travel is not allowed within the Alpental permit area when the mountain is closed. Uphill travel at Alpental is still strictly prohibited until stated otherwise. Uphill travel at Summit West, Summit Central, and Summit East is permitted. Scroll down for more detail about restrictions.
I can't imagine parking in any of those lots would be a problem
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gib
- [Gib-WSDOT]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 69
- Thank you received: 2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gib
- [Gib-WSDOT]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 69
- Thank you received: 2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jim Oker
- [jim_oker]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 900
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gib
- [Gib-WSDOT]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 69
- Thank you received: 2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pipedream
- [pipedream]
- Offline
- Premium Member
- Posts: 629
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CCmtn
- [CCmtn]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
Oh the irony. The day uphill travel restrictions are lifted is the day the USFS clamps down on access. From what I've seen, effective 12:01am Sat. 3/27, all trailheads, campgrounds and day-use areas on USFS land in the state of Washington are temporarily closed until further notice or Sept. 30th, whichever comes first :'(
While ski areas are not specifically mentioned in the announcement, I'm guessing it's fair to assume they would classify as either day use areas or trailheads?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- markharf
- [markharf]
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 339
- Thank you received: 3
I am aware that people are breaking the rules all day long. I see them driving to various recreational venues here, too. I'm not making a case on moral grounds; my concern is that breaking the rules--easily justified by anyone determined to ski--will provoke even more draconian controls on us all. In fact, the governor's announcement last Monday followed close on the heels of his people consulting with locals around the state about the degree of compliance (or lack thereof) with the existing voluntary guidelines that they observed locally.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hankj
- [hankj]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 170
- Thank you received: 0
From the perspective of common sense, no one is going to get coronavirus skinning around a ski area if they drive alone and maintain space from other users. Not gonna happen. I suppose you might need to stop for gas and touch a gas pump. I'd pack my own food for sure.
If bc skiing is enough of a contagion concern to be banned, then all take out food should for sure be immediately banned: it's not necessary, and carries probably 1000 times the transmission risk of skiing up a hill or walking in the woods. It's more dangerous than the supermarket because to survive on takeout you need ~10x exposures compared to loading up at the supermarket.
We still apparently need unlimited burritos and french fries, but moving around in nature is so dangerous and extraneous? hmmm.
I'd hate though to endanger first-responders. In thousands of trips to the wood, I've never needed help. The risk of skiing though certainly is bigger than walking the dog around the block. Is it really that much of a concern? If so then so be it, the State can lock me up inside for the rest of the year I guess ....
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- markharf
- [markharf]
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 339
- Thank you received: 3
But apparently that's not as clear to others as it seemed to me. I suppose that if enough people drive to and from their favored recreational sites, the order will eventually be clarified--I'm guessing in the direction of more restrictions, not less.
I've been reading about lockdowns which allow walking or bike riding within a kilometer or two of home. That doesn't sound like much fun to me. Other places (in Europe, so far) allow people out of their homes on foot only if they're carrying affidavits--and sometimes evidence--that they're buying food or medicine. Think that won't happen here? Hell, I never thought things would go as far as they already have, here in the land of the free.
My main interest here isn't to stake out some sort of high moral ground; I'm really mainly interested in forestalling more restrictions. There are only a few places locally where trails of any sort are still open, and I'd like them to stay that way. People are angry, and one angry passerby blaming all those carefree recreationalists for his/her lost job or dead grandma can create a lot of trouble for the rest of us.
I doubt I'm going to convince anyone to see this differently. That's ok. I don't mind eating an appropriate serving of crow if it turns out I'm wrong, either. We'll see.
Mark
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Lowell_Skoog
- [Lowell_Skoog]
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1460
- Thank you received: 16
If you listened to the governor's speech when the order was issued, it was clear (to me at least) that for essential exercise he meant walks, bike rides, etc, near home. Also, it's not just Washington:
How Skiing Through a Pandemic Can Create a Community Crisis
www.nytimes.com/2020/03/29/sports/skiing...alanche-warning.html
quote:
"It is not a competition to see what you can get away with," said Polis, who had ordered the resorts to close on March 15.
"If you need to recreate and you love our outdoors," he added, "do it in communities close to your home. This pandemic is not a vacation. It's not the time to drive two or three hours from Denver to mountain communities, many of which are reeling from the crisis."
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hillybilly
- [crosson]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 0
Those remarks are that of Polis and not Inslee. It was a remark in passing offering guidance only but is questionable how well it applies in the context of Washington State. "Close to home" can be anything around here. There is no reason to get frustrated at folk who interpret this differently.
As a personal opinion, if you are on a tour, cause a scene, and place strain on our SAR and community medical teams you are not acting in the best interest of your community.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PS44
- [PS44]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 18
- Thank you received: 0
Well said.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hillybilly
- [crosson]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 0
People are congregating in mass on top of red mountain, skiing on top of each other. People are aggregating at destination and ski objectives. People are skinning up in mass on Sessel. Summit west and lot 4 parking lots full on weekends where resorts aren't running. I saw 6 people skinning up in the rain on Sessel last saturday via webcam.
Judgement, mountain etiquette, and actual covid concerns aside, local and state governments see this activity and feel pressured to further lock things down. So while I agree with everything you said on principle I get where Lowell is coming from as well. The majority of people going up there are skiing the same objective, with moderate to large group size. A smaller but growing majority are getting into the BC for the first time.
My fear is the "Scene" will pressure policy makers to lock things down further. The first major SAR incident we have in WA this year may very well end skiing all togehter in this state.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- markharf
- [markharf]
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 339
- Thank you received: 3
I'd even prefer a total, explicit, enforced shutdown of all driving to outdoor recreation to what I fear is coming--a total, explicit, enforced shut down of recreation itself. In Bellingham, Galbraith and the city parks are still open; state parks are closed but as far as I know still allowing use of trails but not facilities; on DNR land even use of trails is forbidden. This is just a beginning. In Chamonix (so I read), you can still take a walk or bike ride, but only within a kilometer of home--backed up by police enforcement and requiring written statement of intention, plus proof.
I'm not hearing anyone changing their minds about this based on arguments here and elsewhere on the web, although I hope I'm wrong about that. I do think it's worth listening in on other discussions, including the ones going on among people not so invested in maintaining access to outdoor recreation. Some of those people are the ones making policy--now and for the future--and they're not really listening to all the protestations of positive intent or self-serving analyses of the governor's week-old orders. They're just looking for reasons (call them "excuses") to prevent us from leaving our living rooms.
Once again, I'll be glad to be wrong about any or all of the above.
Mark
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- hankj
- [hankj]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 170
- Thank you received: 0
Exactly. Regardless of one's interpretation of the governor's "Stay At Home" orders, I believe we are on the verge of a far more severe shutdown. Personally, I'd prefer not to contribute to that. In fact, I'd prefer that the rest of you not contribute as well.
So no one should do anything in anticipation that the State might order everyone to do nothing if someone does something?
I'm personally uncomfortable thinking about my relationship with the State in those child-parent dynamics ("dad didn't say we couldn't go in the pool, but if we go in the pool he might tell us we can't go in the pool for a month ...").
I prefer to see the State's communications as legal language. And then as a private citizen I choose to behave safely and pro-socially inside of those legal limits. It seems to me that one can ski under one's own power in ways that don't increase the chances of disease transmission, and that minimize risk of personal injury.
Supermarkets and buses are necessary, so not good comparisons. But take out food isn't banned, is allowed by the State, and is an enormous infection risk compared to parking on the side of the highway and skinning up a hill.
And the State explicitly says riding a bike is okay. I'll bet the risk of doing that in the city of Seattle is comparable to, or maybe worse than, "poaching" some avy-safe blue runs.
Anyway, I choose to live my life in ways that expects the State to be measured and reasonable in relation to my freedoms. I won't live in a way that anticipates overreach and irrationality. Often that's what they do, but I won't tacitly validate it. If they haven't banned skiing I'm gonna ski, and no one's gonna get sick because of it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- tele.skier
- [tele.skier]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 97
- Thank you received: 0
I prefer the rest of you not use the stairs in your house either and sleep on your downstairs couches. It's just not right to risk the lives of others with your irresponsible behavor.Â
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PS44
- [PS44]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 18
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Enzolola
- [Enzolola]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 0
In partnership and alignment with the United States Forest Service and its closure of developed recreational day-use areas, all terrain within The Summit's permit area is now closed. This closure applies to all Summit base areas and all types of recreational access, including but not limited to; ski touring, skiing, snowboarding, hiking, snow play, and sledding.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HappyCamper
- [Greenwood Man]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 27
- Thank you received: 0
Hoping for month 1 in...May? June?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- charlier
- [charlier]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 11
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HappyCamper
- [Greenwood Man]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 27
- Thank you received: 0
Hoping for a miracle in April:
komonews.com/archive/number-of-march--ap...currences-in-seattle
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PhilH
- [PhilH]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 67
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Donnelly_M
- [Donnelly_M]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 95
- Thank you received: 0
I just drove by the local golf course and golfers were golfing away. The parking lot had lots of cars in it. I heard they have a one person per cart rule. So, I can't drive up to a parking lot in the forest, alone in my car, and my partner alone in his car, and go wandering off into the backcountry...but, we can go golfing in town. Does this make sense?
Maybe it's easier to make sure people are social distancing on a golf course and violations of social distancing can more easily be reported rather than if say 100 people drive separately to a trail head but then there is little control of what people may do 5, 10, or 15 plus miles into the wilderness. I guess they figure it's safer to just close all the national forests, than risk people flocking to the trail heads and risk people coming into close contact or violating social distancing guidelines. I would see this as a great opportunity to hire those who are out of work and give them jobs as park rangers making sure people are abiding by the rules rather than just closing all the forests.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kamtron
- [kamtron]
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 269
- Thank you received: 8
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- fuzz
- [fuzz]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 1
- Thank you received: 0
Looks like a lot of confirmation bias and "expert halo" thinking.
"I really want to go skiing" -- therefore my bias is that it should be OK within the bounds of the Governor's edict and the risks to myself and others.
"I'm smarter/better informed/more rational than other people and better able to gauge the risks to myself and to others" -- therefore no prob for me to go skiing because my expert status privileges me to live outside the constraints that apply to others.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- frank
- [El Destructor]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 18
- Thank you received: 0
Stay at home if that's the responsible decision for yourself. For others that will get what they need from nature during these stressful times.. cheers.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.