- Posts: 69
- Thank you received: 0
[another] Dynafit radical quality issue
- Eli3
- [Eli3]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
So... I emailed salewa usa and got the following response
"Sorry to hear of your situation and we are thankful that you are OK. All Dynafit Bindings have a two year warranty for all manufacturer defect. Looking at your pictures it appears you are using quiver killer inserts and the thread locker you used reacted with the plastic causing it to melt and weaken . This is not covered under warranty since the original screws were not used."
I am using quiver killers, but used plastic safe threadlocker. Additionally, what I assume the rep is saying is melting is clear in the photo - black plastic doesn't melt clear. It is epoxy left over from the original mounting. I'm probably out a binding here, but a pretty crappy outcome from a grossly negligent manufacturing QA process.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Kneel Turner
- [Kneel Turner]
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 379
- Thank you received: 1
Seriously though, I don't pay much attention to the tech binding front, but it sure seems the older versions of Dynafits are a good investment.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dfhkvs
- [dfhkvs]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 43
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Skier of the Hood
- [Skier of the Hood]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 38
- Thank you received: 3
Update: After a month we finally got them to cave and agree to a replacement.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Charlie Hagedorn
- [trumpetsailor]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 913
- Thank you received: 1
I almost exclusively run skis with inserts these days, and I've once cracked the base of a binding by using tapered-head screws where flat-bottom screws were required (yes, I knew this was bad, but there was pow, and all I had on hand was tapered heads).
It's hard for manufacturers to test their bindings against all possible screws, so warrantying for original screws only does make sense. It would be a kind gesture to the ski community to provide recommended machine-screw head geometries, threadlocker brands, and torque specs. If they do, we should recognize that doing so is a voluntary act that's contrary to short-term business interest.
Do any other manufacturers have a similar "original screws" policy?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Eli3
- [Eli3]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 69
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- slacker
- [slacker]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 24
- Thank you received: 0
I almost exclusively run skis with inserts these days
its a little bit of thread drift but ... Is insert failure a rjsk with a certain type of ski construction? I'm considering using quiver killer inserts on a pair of wailer 112 w the tour 1 construction. I'm wondering if this is a bad idea.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Randito
- [Randito]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 960
- Thank you received: 1
its a little bit of thread drift but ... Is insert failure a rjsk with a certain type of ski construction? I'm considering using quiver killer inserts on a pair of wailer 112 w the tour 1 construction. I'm wondering if this is a bad idea.
Inserts are heavier than factory screws and testing indicates that if installed properly their pull-out strength is about the same as factory screws.
The hole drilled in the top sheet of the ski is larger and could weaken the ski if not installed and glued properly.
Really the only reason to install inserts is if you want to own many pairs of skis, but are trying economize on how many pairs of bindings you need to buy.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.