- Posts: 126
- Thank you received: 1
Feb 24, 2014 Musings of a Whiner Baby
- jtack
- [jtack]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jim Oker
- [jim_oker]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 900
- Thank you received: 0
That said, I'm also aware that there are other folks who consciously decide to accept a different level of risk than me, and I'm also aware that I and my crew did not eliminate all risk of deadly hazard. So we're all choosing some degree of risk. My hope is that the folks getting onto the bigger lines in recent days are reasonably aware of where they are on the risk continuum.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- kerwinl
- [kerwinl]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- wooley12
- [wooley12]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 243
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jdclimber
- [jdclimber]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 156
- Thank you received: 0
Personally, I was sort of amazed and a bit concerned over a few of the TRs and statements about the goings on around Snoqualmie. Although the Phantom, Slot and Chair Peak circum-nav are some of my very favorite tours. I wouldn't want to get near them with the "low probability/high consequence" persistent weak layer we have now. Perhaps that makes me a wuss, but I am ok with that. There will be other days for my favorite tours. Might be next season before I like the idea of spending time under hang-fire in big country. The tough part is knowing when the terrain is safe and when someone "got away with it".
Selfishly what concerns me is that if a culture is established of going big in bad (my opinion) conditions, then everything will get skied out for everyone who practices good behavior (and patience for things to settle out). About 10 years ago, I decided I really wanted to ski DOA on Blackcomb peak. However, the fact that it is an avy chute bothered me, and I decided I would only go when it was a low danger day (and still relatively untracked). Fast forward a few years, people do it all the time in all conditions and if I wait for safe conditions, I will end up with moguls on that sweet, sweet run. My conditions might never happen.
Hopefully that is not the future for all of our avalanche-able accessible backcountry. Though I know that is already the conditions on some nice "side country", especially around Baker.
End muse.
Stay on the right side of the snow!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jwplotz
- [jwplotz]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 62
- Thank you received: 0
Go big, medium or small. Who cares. But please, stop the self flagellation about it afterwards, because it only detracts from a potentially great read!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Lowell_Skoog
- [Lowell_Skoog]
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1460
- Thank you received: 16
I'm annoyed by this trend to post a TR apologizing to the b/c skiing community at large if something happens, including a step-by-step bullet point tome about "what I did wrong". It's ok to be un-apologetically brash in your approach to skiing and reporting of your skiing. I'm thankful that the Hummels, Sjue, Dan H., Pretiore, Lurie, et. al's skiing wasn't (and isn't) influenced by the b/c skiing community's opinion of what is acceptable risk. I and I'm sure many others have used their experiences as inspiration for further adventures.
Go big, medium or small. Who cares. But please, stop the self flagellation about it afterwards, because it only detracts from a potentially great read!
Are you serious?
If you find thoughtful writing about risk boring, there are other places to find the sort of writing you apparently like. Or you can write it yourself.
But I'm kind of dumb-founded that you would actually criticize it here.
Maybe you're joking and I walked into your joke. If so, ya got me.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jake the Brit
- [Jake the Brit]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 70
- Thank you received: 0
I'm annoyed by this trend
I agree, it's screwing up the prose. But we're all so paranoid about this snowpack, the prose is shot through with as much information as possible so noone gets slid to death by following my gung-ho TR.
Hopefully normal service will resume shortly as the weather changes & the weak layer sublimes.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Jim Oker
- [jim_oker]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 900
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Charlie Hagedorn
- [trumpetsailor]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 913
- Thank you received: 1
www.cascadecrusades.org/SkiMountaineerin...e2008/seface2008.htm
skisickness.com/CascadePass/NCBuckner/Avy.html
cascadeclimbers.com/forum/ubbthreads.php...wflat&Number=1097842
There are more, as there are for anyone, but three may be sufficient to make the point. The writing may be succinct, but lessons are there.
To reply to jtack's original concern, I'm not sure that anyone knows if there's an easily-triggerable avalanche crocodile lurking deep beneath the westside snowpack on any particular slope, but there is uncertainty. We don't see this quantity of accumulation often, so few of us have meaningful experience with it. There will be more powder in March and April.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BillK
- [bkent]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 151
- Thank you received: 0
"No need to freak, just wait a week"
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- BillK
- [bkent]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 151
- Thank you received: 0
I'm thankful that the Hummels, Sjue, Dan H., Pretiore, Lurie, et. al's skiing wasn't (and isn't) influenced by the b/c skiing community's opinion of what is acceptable risk.
Interesting that you mention these guys. Ever since I've been viewing their stuff on the 'net, I expect to be reading an RIP thread about at least one of them.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- HillsHaveEyes
- [HillsHaveEyes]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 32
- Thank you received: 0
Interesting that you mention these guys. Ever since I've been viewing their stuff on the 'net, I expect to be reading an RIP thread about at least one of them.
Gnarly. Go find some wood to knock on right now.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marcus
- [Marcus]
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1230
- Thank you received: 0
Interesting that you mention these guys. Ever since I've been viewing their stuff on the 'net, I expect to be reading an RIP thread about at least one of them.
Can we please not go there? Thanks.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- skykilo
- [skykilo]
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 304
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- flowing alpy
- [flowing alpy]
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1272
- Thank you received: 0
b
happy b day to you and corey.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- blitz
- [Blitz]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 201
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- davep
- [davep]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 39
- Thank you received: 0
Also, you can see pictures from AC work at Crystal from the King down into Damn Fine Forest:
kimkircher.com/2014/02/23/big-avalanche-...out-treewell-safety/
And large natural slides (ie. Kempers on the backside of Powder Bowl @ Crystal).
www.blogcrystal.com/2014/02/20/avalanche...wells-and-deep-snow/
I know alot of these big slides had explosives to help them on their way, but to me it makes it obvious that the weak layer is there and that there is LOTS of snow on top of it.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.