- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
Help me choose a new waxless backcountry ski
- mtnbbud
- [mtnbbud]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
Some skis I saw at the ski shop closest to my town were:
Madshus Annum MGV Omni Skis
Fischer Skis S-Bound 112 Skis
Rossignol BC 125 Positrack Skis
Salomon X-ADV 89 Grip Skis
Any advise or opinions? I plan on using my three pin Voile cable bindings with my Scarpa T4 boots.
Thanks.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pin!head
- [pin!head]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 163
- Thank you received: 0
I've got a couple of days on them now and I'm really impressed. Skied them at the ski hill in recycled bootdeep and they excelled in every type of turn and held their own on the hardpack too.!!!!!!!!
Rave Review!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- David_Britton
- [LearnToTurn]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 12
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- 0
- []
- Visitor
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Andrew Carey
- [acarey]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 912
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Schenk
- [Schenk]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 26
- Thank you received: 0
The Guides (Annum) ski well also but are not as wide and don't handle the variable snow as well. They do OK on harder snows though, and seem to glide just a little bit better than my Vectors...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mtnbbud
- [mtnbbud]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
I was sort-of leaning towards the Madshus Annum MGV Omni, but now I'm not so sure!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Big Steve
- [Big Steve]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 141
- Thank you received: 0
Of the postitive-based models, I've tried only the Guide/Annum, which has a very soft overall flex. Gawd, it glides slow on low-angle terrain. I would imaging the Vector, which has virtually no camber, is really slow on the flats. (I also Nordic ski; the drag might not be noticable to someone who doesn't do much XC skiing.) I'd like to see a waxless ski with a mild tip rocker, meaningful camber underfoot and a medium soft traditional tail.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ryanb
- [ryanb]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 55
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- fly-by
- [fly-by]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- davidG
- [davidG]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 764
- Thank you received: 0
If meadow skipping is the game, then the stronger cambered (and some rocker!) of either of the new S-Bounds might be a better choice, especially given the binding/boot choice. Some notables might even say they are fine for turns..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mtnbbud
- [mtnbbud]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
I think Big Steve has a good take on the OP's query. The great thing about the recent crop of waxless offerings is the opportunity to bias for the down. Totally love my BC 125's and Vector BC (and not so much the Guide/Annum) - but then, I'm in it for the turns.
If meadow skipping is the game, then the stronger cambered (and some rocker!) of either of the new S-Bounds might be a better choice, especially given the binding/boot choice. Some notables might even say they are fine for turns..
True - I'm more of a tourer, but I want to be able to tackle the hills.
Thanks for all the great advise. It sounds like all the skis are of good quality and the decision I have to make should be based on what type of compromise I want to make. I have been wondering if a single camber ski would be better than the camber and a half of the Fischers.
You guys are giving me great advice. I'm not that skilled making turns on my Fischers. If it helps at all, here's a link to pictures from my last trip to a lookout. They might give a better idea of a typical trip.
picasaweb.google.com/1184265963414814989.../5711967821843438722
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Big Steve
- [Big Steve]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 141
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- davidG
- [davidG]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 764
- Thank you received: 0
If the very fun BC 125, a 'nordic crossover', is selected, note that the obvious binding mount reference scribe is the ski balance point, typical of nordic gear, not necessarily the pin line 'must mount' location (pin line on balance point is fine for some aspects of touring, but may be less than ideal for turns depending on style - I would mount pinline 1-2 cm forward, especially if it's about the down..). No constructive comments to offer in this regard for the S-Bound..
While everything is on sale now, I know the dollars add up, but if touring for miles is in the cards, then investment in a free pivot binding will save lots of energy (for the down and climb back ) The Rossi is definitely a candidate for something like a Switchback. The S-bound I'd be more inclined to stay with pin and cable (or hardwire).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Big Steve
- [Big Steve]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 141
- Thank you received: 0
Question for those on BC125: I've heard that the base is extruded p-tex that will not accept glide wax. Is that true?
davidG and others, do you think the T4 is enough boot to turn the BC125 or Vector BC?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- davidG
- [davidG]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 764
- Thank you received: 0
About the BC125 base, I don't know, but I hotwax it as needed and seems to be receptive. And it's considerably faster on low angle glides than the Vector BC.
Agree with BOF on CRS, but hey, it's about the turns..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Skier of the Hood
- [Skier of the Hood]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 38
- Thank you received: 3
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Andrew Carey
- [acarey]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 912
- Thank you received: 0
I purchased a pair of Rossi 125 and have used them early season around Revelstoke and Rogers Pass, and on Saphire Col during the most recent dry spell. I have them mounted with onyx bindings which i'm sure will bring some chuckles. Skis like most touring 90 underfoot traditional skis. The flex isn't as progressive as other touring skis but for 200$ I can overlook it. Fun ski to have during long flat approaches (a-slog-in valley). Stoked to use them around the cascades come spring time. When there is pow to be had though I of course use drifters
I ski my Karhu Guides with Dynafit Speed Radicals and TLT5 Mountain boots.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RossB
- [RossB]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 81
- Thank you received: 0
I wouldn't want to argue with the Rossignol rep, but my guess is that BC 125 means a tip width of (about) 125. Just as BC 110 means a tip of 110, etc.
I don't know about these specific skis, but I've been impressed with the speed of Fischer's waxless bottoms. I think Atomic uses the same scale pattern (I wouldn't be surprised if the same people in Austria supply both companies).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Andrew Carey
- [acarey]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 912
- Thank you received: 0
Another one to consider is the Alpina X Terrain. I think it fits in this category.
I wouldn't want to argue with the Rossignol rep, but my guess is that BC 125 means a tip width of (about) 125. Just as BC 110 means a tip of 110, etc.
I don't know about these specific skis, but I've been impressed with the speed of Fischer's waxless bottoms. I think Atomic uses the same scale pattern (I wouldn't be surprised if the same people in Austria supply both companies).
Some of the Atomics, Fischers, and Salomons are the same ski--IIRC the the Rainier, Rebound, and X-Adv 88 are the same with different graphics.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mtnbbud
- [mtnbbud]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
Steve, good point about the boot.. T4 for the Rossi? yeah, but just - I'll meadowskip the BC125 with Excursions, including laps, but also boot up with T1s for resort and sidecountry - much fun. For the Vector BC, no way is T4 enough boot...
About the BC125 base, I don't know, but I hotwax it as needed and seems to be receptive. And it's considerably faster on low angle glides than the Vector BC.
Agree with BOF on CRS, but hey, it's about the turns..
Good to know! I really want to reuse my t4's with Voile Hardwire 3-Pin Bindings. My wife wasn't too happy when I told her it was time to replace my touring skis. :
Would the T4 with the Voile bindings work with the Rossignol BC 110's?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RossB
- [RossB]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 81
- Thank you received: 0
Pardon my ignorance, but could someone explain the whole "not enough boot" concept. I come from a cross country background, and get some of it. Obviously, you can't put a regular cross country boot on a heavy metal edged ski and expect to make good turns with it. The boot is too floppy, and the ski is too heavy.Steve, good point about the boot.. T4 for the Rossi? yeah, but just - I'll meadowskip the BC125 with Excursions, including laps, but also boot up with T1s for resort and sidecountry - much fun. For the Vector BC, no way is T4 enough boot...
But with these skis, they look to be about the same weight. More to the point, it looks like the Vector BC is lighter than the Rossignol 125. If so, then why could you drive a BC 125, but not a Vector BC with the same boot. What am I missing?
(thanks in advance)
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Big Steve
- [Big Steve]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 141
- Thank you received: 0
The Vector BC and BC125 have roughly the same waist width
The BC125 has more camber and a longer camber pattern, which, in theory, would require more boot.
Vector is softer and has rocker tip, which, in theory, should militate in favor of less boot
Although I haven't skied either of them, I would think that a boot stiff enough and big enough to ski the BC125 would be sufficient for the Vector
ETA: For tele, add a 5th factor: activity of the binding
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- fly-by
- [fly-by]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 2
- Thank you received: 0
Good to know! I really want to reuse my t4's with Voile Hardwire 3-Pin Bindings. My wife wasn't too happy when I told her it was time to replace my touring skis. :
Would the T4 with the Voile bindings work with the Rossignol BC 110's?
I ski T4s and Voile 3 pin w/cables on the S-bound 98s, and they are more than enough. T4/Hardwires with the 110s would be nicely balanced combination IMHO.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- davidG
- [davidG]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 764
- Thank you received: 0
Pardon my ignorance, but could someone explain the whole "not enough boot" concept. I come from a cross country background, and get some of it. Obviously, you can't put a regular cross country boot on a heavy metal edged ski and expect to make good turns with it. The boot is too floppy, and the ski is too heavy.
But with these skis, they look to be about the same weight. More to the point, it looks like the Vector BC is lighter than the Rossignol 125. If so, then why could you drive a BC 125, but not a Vector BC with the same boot. What am I missing?
(thanks in advance)
Good point and fair question. It should have occurred to me that my statement was not defensible based on ski specs. I own both of those skis (also most of the others discussed here, including the X Terrain, which I've championed here in the past - but the Rossi is a far better meadowskipper when trolling for turns). I skiied most of last year on the BC125, both bc and resort and I've loaned them out both last season and this one, and we all agree, the ski handles like a Miata. I've skiied all of this season on the Vector - it's not a Miata. And the Vector feels much better at speed than the Rossi even with a very similar running surface length. The Vector BC came from the alpine side, built with carbon, to which they added a pattern base - the Rossi comes, seemingly, from the nordic side, scaled-up and shaped for the down, including on-piste. Comments from ski engineers would be welcome here..
But what does this have to do with the boot, T4 or otherwise? Simply that the Vector skis like a larger ski - still fairly nimble, but more stable, and rewarded when given bootcuff pressure and rolled ankles. Sure, you can 'ski' the Vector with a T4, but you won't find the skis' potential with such a touring shoe, IMO.
I'm holding firm with my vote as noted earlier, in this application, for the larger S-Bound unless the OP wants to change out other gear or to bias more toward turns in which case I happily recommend the BC125 (or 123 )
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RossB
- [RossB]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 81
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Andrew Carey
- [acarey]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 912
- Thank you received: 0
... As I mentioned in my prior post, the Guide/Annum I tried was very soft, a real wet noodle. ...
Big Steve, I'm wondering what length Guide you skied. I'm 230 lbs and I ski the 195 cm and wouldn't describe it as a wet noodle compared with my Fishcher Outtabounds, Salomon X-Adv 88 (supposed to be the Rebound, but my 190s have the strongest double camber of any waxless I've skied, and the poorest metal edge), Karhu Catamounts (a weird flex) , or Black Diamond Valmontes (soft, single camber, altho advertised as 1.5 camber)--I get better kick-and-glide (exc. for the X-Adv), climbing, and turning with the Guide (because of my weight, I almost always use the longest ski in the model; on true XC skis, I use the paper under the foot test to choose lenght). They are noodly compared with my Madshus Voss (which I used for groomed trails and some off piste on the Methow trail system). I've used them on fairly high speed downhill runs on the MTTA (roughly and occasionally groomed logging roads) and they hold an edge well and turn surely but I found them not to turn that well in deeper backcountry snows (length + flex?)--especially compared to my real bc skis (Volkl Snowwolf and Dynafit 7 Summits and Manaslus).
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- pin!head
- [pin!head]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 163
- Thank you received: 0
True - I'm more of a tourer, but I want to be able to tackle the hills.
I'm not that skilled making turns on my Fischers. If it helps at all, here's a link to pictures from my last trip to a lookout. They might give a better idea of a typical trip.
picasaweb.google.com/1184265963414814989.../5711967821843438722
Looking at what your doing. Volie Vector BC. Final answer.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- mtnbbud
- [mtnbbud]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 19
- Thank you received: 0
I hear REI has a great return policy. Will they order skis they don't typically carry?
Thank again for all the advice. I'm still undecided! I'm thinking with the T4 boots it might be best to go with the Rossignol 110's or the Fischer 112's. If my boots and Voile bindings could drive the Vectors, those look pretty sweet.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Andrew Carey
- [acarey]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 912
- Thank you received: 0
I've also purchased gear at the TAY sponsor, ProGuideService, they have a winter sale on now; but I don't recall seeing any waxless skis in there the last time I was in the shop.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.