Home > Forum > SeattleMet Articles -December 2011

SeattleMet Articles -December 2011

  • Zap
  • [Zap]
  • Zap's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Platinum Member
  • Platinum Member
More
27 Dec 2011 08:37 #203148 by Zap
The article discusses the avalanche accident at Tunnel Creek which is near Stevens Pass along with interviews with Mark Moore and Marcus's group.

www.seattlemet.com/travel-and-outdoors/a...che-december-2011/1/

The same issue has an article about Warren Miller.

www.seattlemet.com/arts-and-entertainmen...egend-december-2011/

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • pipedream
  • [pipedream]
  • pipedream's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Premium Member
  • Premium Member
More
27 Dec 2011 13:15 #203151 by pipedream
Replied by pipedream on topic Re: SeattleMet Articles -December 2011
If anyone has questions about the Tunnel Creek accident article, I can try to field them.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
28 Dec 2011 11:17 #203163 by Eli3
Replied by Eli3 on topic Re: SeattleMet Articles -December 2011
Sobering story. Especially since the avy danger looked like it was 'moderate' where the slide occurred below 4000'! Those wet slides in early spring are scary...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
28 Dec 2011 11:55 #203166 by rippy
Replied by rippy on topic Re: SeattleMet Articles -December 2011
This was a hard article to read given the tragic outcome but extremely informative. Many years back, we intended a backside run to the hairpin turn and within a few minutes of sun breaking through the clouds, we noticed shooting cracks appearing. By stomping at the edge of a bowl, the entire thing took off in the form of a wet slide. Given the snow had been cold most of the day, it was scary how quick 8, maybe 10 minutes of sun changes the game that drastically. I also saw a few minutes of sun generate a very large avalanche off Silverstar on a climb there in the spring. Subdued all interest in finishing that effort as the aspect and orientation forwarned that the final pitch was not to be tested. The article gives insights of a condition not always properly respected. Thanks for posting it !

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • jwplotz
  • [jwplotz]
  • jwplotz's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Junior Member
  • Junior Member
More
06 Jan 2012 17:46 #203310 by jwplotz
Replied by jwplotz on topic Re: SeattleMet Articles -December 2011
This article bugs me. Starting with the opening abstract, it creates a theme that seems to say, without explicitly saying so, that it's the NWAC crew's responsibility to save us from ourselves when in the backcountry. In the final paragraph, the author seems to be asking the survivor whether he blames NWAC for his friend's unfortunate death.

Tragic accident, but annoying assumptions being made by Seattle Met.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Charlie Hagedorn
  • [trumpetsailor]
  • Charlie Hagedorn's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
More
06 Jan 2012 21:15 #203314 by Charlie Hagedorn
Replied by Charlie Hagedorn on topic Re: SeattleMet Articles -December 2011
Does anyone know what "... there is a do-not-resuscitate policy in King County" means in this context? Thanks!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Kneel Turner
  • [Kneel Turner]
  • Kneel Turner's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Senior Member
  • Senior Member
More
06 Jan 2012 22:10 #203315 by Kneel Turner
Replied by Kneel Turner on topic Re: SeattleMet Articles -December 2011
I suspect this was a misunderstanding of the author.  I can only guess that the Patroller was referring to medical control (an ER doc) calling off efforts due to pt. condition, down time, lack of pt. response, and other circumstances of the incident.  This would only be done after all efforts and options were exercised.

The only reasons to withold or cease efforts in King County are:
■injuries incompatible with life (decapitation)
■dependent lividity, rigor mortis
■advance directive stating resuscitation should be withheld (legal DNR paperwork signed by pt. and their physician)
■compelling reasons to withhold resuscitation (end stage of a terminal condition with written or verbal refusal from family, or patient)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Charlie Hagedorn
  • [trumpetsailor]
  • Charlie Hagedorn's Avatar
  • Offline
  • Elite Member
  • Elite Member
More
06 Jan 2012 23:12 #203316 by Charlie Hagedorn
Replied by Charlie Hagedorn on topic Re: SeattleMet Articles -December 2011
Thanks!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.