- Posts: 124
- Thank you received: 0
Avalanche Discussion
- ~Link~
- [Link]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
So far, it looks like there is going to be a 6-10" layer of ice in most places within the PNW. The storm activity to hit this weekend of 12/12-12/14 looks to bring Artic-air, cold temps, and a dumping of super light-weight dry snow.
Any thoughts on the future snow pack as influenced by such a sandwiched light-weight snow build on top of an ice layer??? Possible faceting, perhaps? Will this be a week layer to look out within the coming weeks of the season once we receive an additional 2-3' of snow?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Baltoro
- [Baltoro]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 22
- Thank you received: 0
I'll add what I put in a Paradise area report:
Things softened up just a tiny bit as we were leaving on Thursday (12/11). It doesn't look like the existing snow would've had a chance to soften up though due to continued cold temps and wind so most likely this current load is going to slide. Or maybe worse since this new snow has such a low water content it won't sufficiently weight the crust and the whole works will stay stable for a bit longer for more snow to accumulate on top, then once properly loaded it'll go.
Either way, we should see this crust layer on any pit that goes to within 2' of the bed surface with all this current fluff on top.
I'd love to hear others opinions as that's just my thoughts. I'm new to the whole telemetry thing so by all means if I'm way off base please chime in.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Lowell_Skoog
- [Lowell_Skoog]
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1460
- Thank you received: 16
Emphasis added ...
BACKCOUNTRY AVALANCHE FORECAST FOR THE OLYMPICS WASHINGTON
CASCADES AND MT HOOD AREA
NORTHWEST WEATHER AND AVALANCHE CENTER SEATTLE WASHINGTON
0830 AM PDT SAT DEC 13 2008
[...]
SATURDAY NIGHT THROUGH SUNDAY NIGHT
Strong east to northeast winds are expected in most
locations late Saturday and Sunday along with bitterly
cold temperatures. While decreasing light showers are
likely in the north with gradually decreasing light to
moderate snow or snow showers in the south, the
increasing and shifting winds combined with very cold
temperatures should still help to produce a further
slight increase in the danger. The danger increase should
be greatest on west to southwest exposure slopes above 5
to 6000 feet where locally considerable danger is
possible on steeper terrain with a smooth underlying
ground surface or on slopes where most anchors have been
buried. Travelers are urged to perform stability tests
before traversing steeper wind loaded terrain, especially
in higher elevation wind loaded terrain, as the cold air
temperatures and associated strong temperature contrasts
in the snowpack should help weaken the bond of recent
snow to the pre-existing snow surface.
A significant danger may also exist from the expected
weather in most areas. The combination of very low air
temperatures and strong winds should produce wind chills
dropping to well below zero. Back country and other
travelers are urged to take precaution to protect exposed
flesh and minimize time exposed to the wind. While some
partial clearing is likely, especially in the north later
Sunday, blowing and drifting of the very low density and
fluffy surface snow should produce reduced visibility and
difficult travel in many areas.
Please also note that the cold air temperatures combined
with the still relatively shallow snowpack should result
in significant faceting and weakening of the overall snow
structure later this weekend and well into next week.
This greatly weakened structure will become a substantial
avalanche concern whenever future more normal and
generally warmer conditions deposit higher density
snowfall over the generally weak and still relatively
shallow Northwest snowpack. The anticipated development
of some surface hoar in wind sheltered areas when skies
begin clearing late Sunday into early next week will only
add to the potential for a rapid avalanche danger
increase when the next significant snowfalls arrive.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CookieMonster
- [CookieMonster]
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 392
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- ~Link~
- [Link]
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 124
- Thank you received: 0
It would be great to have a multiperspective dialogue going on snowpack.
I'll add what I put in a Paradise area report:
Things softened up just a tiny bit as we were leaving on Thursday (12/11). It doesn't look like the existing snow would've had a chance to soften up though due to continued cold temps and wind so most likely this current load is going to slide. Or maybe worse since this new snow has such a low water content it won't sufficiently weight the crust and the whole works will stay stable for a bit longer for more snow to accumulate on top, then once properly loaded it'll go.
Either way, we should see this crust layer on any pit that goes to within 2' of the bed surface with all this current fluff on top.
I'd love to hear others opinions as that's just my thoughts. I'm new to the whole telemetry thing so by all means if I'm way off base please chime in.
Great! Thanks for the perspective analysis. That's exactly what I'd like to evoke...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Baltoro
- [Baltoro]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 22
- Thank you received: 0
Tell your partners about this thread and let's keep a continuous dialogue going and keep it on topic throughout the season.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RonL
- [RonL]
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 259
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Stugie
- [stugelmeyer]
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 291
- Thank you received: 0
How about going to dig a pit on top of Goat Island Mountain? That would be an enjoyable slog.
ROTFLMAO!!!
On a more serious note, Kyle and I voted for some "Utah Pow" off of Three Way peak. Today was not a Utah day though, with obvious wind packing affecting the pack and what was falling. The snow falling (I think due to extremely cold temps and high wind) was very small and granular, and extremely light. With the wind packed snow, we triggered some minor soft slabbage, but depths of propogating cracks were anywhere from 6-12". I'm guessing with additional snow and wind this could become not so minor slabbing.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- lordhedgie
- [lordhedgie]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 187
- Thank you received: 0
Some of the guys who arrived early on Friday triggered a small slab off the North side of Table Mountain. By Sunday the same area was tracked out.
What we saw Saturday was about 1m deep snow, largely unconsolidated. There was an ice crust about two feet down, with a layer of surface hoar on top of that. There was also a discrenable layer a few inches down, with just a slight change in density. Sunday we saw mostly the same, with just a little settling and a few extra inches of light on top. Most notably we saw far more depth facets than we did on Saturday. Not enough to really worry me, but if the trend continues it could get really bad. Wind loading appeared very light, although as we were leaving Sunday the winds picked up and we could see a lot of wind transport on Table.
Overall, we found everything pretty safe, but saw enough to say the area needs monitoring to see how it develops. We also noted the NWAC forecast specifically mentioned areas of instability from 5k to 6k, which we stayed out of.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Teleskichica
- [Teleskichica]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 184
- Thank you received: 1
There was an ice crust about two feet down, with a layer of surface hoar on top of that.
I understand the lurking dangers of surface hoar, but any additional insight on ice crusts? It seems that new layers wouldn't bond well to a bed of ice, and I'm trying to understand all of this better.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- lordhedgie
- [lordhedgie]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 187
- Thank you received: 0
The snow we saw seemed to be bonded OK to the crust. I'd just call it neutral right now. If you get a slab going, it's probably going to be on that crust though.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- 0321Recon
- [0321Recon]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 15
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Robie
- [Robie]
- Offline
- Premium Member
- Posts: 554
- Thank you received: 0
We were in Silver basin Crystal mountain where there had been little wind lower in the basin I was seeing no wind effects on the snow . Up near the ridge it was quite a different story.too bad there is'nt enough depth in the trees anywhere yet. On the return to Crystal via the quicksillver run I ski cut a steep nw facing roll just down from the chair offload. I cracked a 8" soft slab that wiped the whole thing. short runout I figured it was side loaded. It had not been skied this year.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Merk
- [Merk]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 78
- Thank you received: 0
I was in that same course so I'll chip in with a bit of info. Our group did a Rutschblock test at around 4400'. It was on a 35 degree slope on an ESE aspect with moderate windloading. It scored RB4. The crack appeared 18" deep. I was pretty suprised with that result and questioned wether or not I would ski on a similar aspect. I'm glad to have taken that course and would recommend it to anyone. I have a whole new respect for this topic.I just got back from my AIARE Level I at Mt Baker, so I feel like I ought to chime in with my observations.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- JoeE
- [Pin_Head]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 1
- Thank you received: 0
Friday afternoon the temp gradients looked good but as the weekend progressed strong gradients had been identified at the crust. Watch for faceting near the crust especially in locations that may have received less accumulation.
I would also watch for near surface facets and possibly surface hoar to develop as a new layer that will be buried by the new snow predicted for tonight and tomorrow. This could create a touchy scenario with significant step down potential for potentially large slabs. Particularly in areas that do not receive the number of triggers (skiers), like the North side of Table Mtn.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bird Dog
- [Bird Dog]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 72
- Thank you received: 0
I did the trip on snowshoes, not really skiable yet. That's my two cents.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RW
- [RW]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 3
- Thank you received: 0
Here is the link.
www.avalanchenw.org/cgi-bin/search_reports.php
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Scole
- [Scole]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 124
- Thank you received: 0
I was in Half Price Books in Everett recently and they had 4 or 5 copies of Powderguide: Managing Avalanche Risk for $6 or $7. It's written by 2 europeans and so far I'm enjoying it. Full color with lots of photos and illustrations of concepts (think USA Today). It also has the first english translation of Werner Munter's 3x3 method of avalanche risk reduction (haven't gotten that far yet). The only knock I have on it is the layout of the book; it's kind of chaotic with colors on colors which distract a bit.
Anyways, you can never have too many books in the library!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Marcus
- [Marcus]
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 1230
- Thank you received: 0
With links to this presentation by NWS:
www.wrh.noaa.gov/sew/Dec20-21WinterStorm/player.html
Good info on avy danger, especially toward the last few slides (no pun intended)...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- peteyboy
- [peteyboy]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 162
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- climberdave
- [climberdave]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 208
- Thank you received: 0
If this were not enough for future concern, reports
Crystal Mountain from early Tuesday morning indicated
widespread surface hoar had formed overnight. If the
surface hoar gets buried by expected low wind snowfall
Tuesday night it may be a recipe for dangerous conditions
to develop once loaded by heavier denser wind deposited
snow expected in the near future!
Be careful, after this next storm, in the Crystal BC - dig your pits boys and girls
cd
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- lordhedgie
- [lordhedgie]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 187
- Thank you received: 0
Recent moderate snowfall has been received in most areas during the past few days. For the most part this recent snow is quite light and fluffy, and intermittent moderate winds have generally transported this onto lee slopes where mostly 6-18 inch soft slabs and considerable avalanche danger exist. These lee slopes are predominantly northeast to southeast exposures near higher ridges and west facing slopes near the passes. Weak layers within our still relatively shallow snowpack are many and very significant, ranging from buried surface hoar layers to intermediate or advanced facets to just really weak low density snow layers. This is perhaps the weakest snowpack structure that I have observed in late December for over 20 years, and many field reports of wading or wallowing in the snow at or near the ground when one steps off the packed trail seem to corroborate this assessment. The only positive aspects of the current snowpack in terms of BC avalanche danger is the relatively lack of cohesion in the near surface snow and the still relatively shallow depth that is allowing for some vegetation and terrain anchoring of this fragile snowpack below about 4 to 5000 feet.
Overall, our delicate snowpack is primed for a rapid and dramatic increase in the danger when loaded by heavier and more normal Cascade snowfalls. Unfortunately, in order to start putting the daily impact of these persistent weak layers of facets and surface hoar behind us, we need substantial loading by heavy dense snow, high winds and/or rain. Although this kind of weather is expected to arrive beginning later Friday and continue for much of Saturday, the current magnitude of frailty that our snowpack embodies may take many such storms to build a strengthening bridge over these buried weaknesses...and even then these flimsy layers may re-emerge as problems next spring. In short, this weekend and especially Saturday may be an excellent time to risk your health away from the mountains by shoveling your walk, exchanging your gifts at the mall, or trying out some new high-tech lowland gear.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- stoudema
- [stoudema]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 199
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- RonL
- [RonL]
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 259
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- savegondor
- [savegondor]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 78
- Thank you received: 0
www.turns-all-year.com/skiing_snowboardi...ex.php?topic=11524.0
Stevens has gotten 2-4 feet of light and dry since then, it has been cold since then, and now it's warming and dumping. I encountered at least three very week layers even then in what amounted to an overall dry snowpack except for the above freezing slush at the bottom. NOAA commentary is saying that this is the weakest (in general) snowpack in two decades. So these coming storms warrent a huge amount of caution and attention. From all the forecasts I've read it's a set up worse than last year.
-j
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- sastrugi slicer
- [sastrugi slicer]
- Offline
- New Member
- Posts: 16
- Thank you received: 0
<snip>
Field reports received late Friday from the Hurricane Ridge area in the Olympics indicate that several skier triggered soft slabs were released, some running an estimated 800 vertical.
<snip>
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bird Dog
- [Bird Dog]
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 72
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CookieMonster
- [CookieMonster]
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 392
- Thank you received: 0
It doesn't really matter if this year's snowpack is set up worse than last year's snowpack because no one here, myself included, is going to stop skiing. Therefore, the first line of defense is guarding against perceptual errors because such errors are always more dangerous than the state of the snowpack. Sorry to get metaphysical but the snowpack just "is". I mention this because there have been some pretty insane posts in the Trip Reports with respect to perception of instability ( along with some interesting errors and misconceptions being passed around in this thread. ) Perception of instability has not been mentioned once in this discussion so far. NWAC produces incredible forecasts but those forecasts are simply not applicable at the slope scale.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Charlie Hagedorn
- [trumpetsailor]
- Offline
- Elite Member
- Posts: 913
- Thank you received: 1
It doesn't really matter if this year's snowpack is set up worse than last year's snowpack because no one here, myself included, is going to stop skiing. ....
... NWAC produces incredible forecasts but those forecasts are simply not applicable at the slope scale.
What? They absolutely are. That's the idea!
I've got the next five days off to ski with a friend. We'll certainly be skiing, but we may not get onto the steeps at all...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- CookieMonster
- [CookieMonster]
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 392
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.