|
|
|
|
|
|
Turns All Year Trip Reports
(1) Viewing these pages constitutes your acceptance of the Terms of Use.
(2) Disclaimer: the accuracy of information here is unknown, use at your own risk.
(3) Trip Report monthly boards: only actual trip report starts a new thread.
(4) Keep it civil and constructive - that is the norm here. |
|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: May 25, 2008 - Quick Snoqualmie Pass (Read 2818 times)
|
Charlie Hagedorn
Member
Offline
Posts: 1133
WWW
|
Took a quick jaunt on new fat skis into a nearly empty Commonwealth Basin and partway up Red. (Red is red again.) Turned 'round not long after hearing a moderately impressive crash (cornice fall on Snoqualmie?). T'was pleasant to bask in the twitters and squeaks of Spring returning to the hills. I was surprised by how well consolidated most of the snow was - I'd been expecting glop. This year's easy snowbridge to Guye/Cave Ridge has basically melted out; I didn't actively hunt for other options. Left unsatisfied by the firm tree-skiing, I skinned up Summit West as well in order to let the big boards run a little on the mush. Fun.
NWS has gotten the forecast right, finally - see some of you at Paradise tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Zap
Member
Offline
Posts: 1615
|
So what "new fat skis" did you buy 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Charlie Hagedorn
Member
Offline
Posts: 1133
WWW
|
So what "new fat skis" did you buy
None!  Thanks to the folks at G3 that offered the "fill in the online ski/marketing survey, maybe you'll win skis" deal, I won a pair of skis. Thanks G3! Never having skied on anything fatter than my Atomic Kongurs, it seemed like a good opportunity to go big and try out the El Hombres. Worried that the 185s might be too much ski for me/too heavy, I decided to go with the cheek height (177) length. They've still got significantly more surface area than my 185 Kongurs, so hopefully I'll still realize whatever benefits a fat ski can provide.
First impressions were pretty positive. I've mounted 'em up with my old pair of Comforts (thanks again to those who helped me out!), and skied 'em with my 3-buckle TLT4s. I was impressed at how well they handled on firm/pine needly snow and even happier with them zipping down the open slopes. Edge hold seemed quite good, and they turned easily. When necessary, sideslipping was super predictable thanks to the girth and long radius sidecut. They plowed through garbagey snow pretty well. The El Hombres are heavier than my Kongur/Classic rig though, so it's not yet clear to me when, outside of winter, the El Hombres'll get pulled out of the closet. They sure would've been nice planing across the afternoon mank at Paradise today... (and slower going up). Despite the weight gain, I suspect they'll be quite efficient at breaking trail on those fabulous knee+ deep skintrack powder days! (the skis, like all skis, cry out to be skied downhill in powder)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Zap
Member
Offline
Posts: 1615
|
I suspect they'll be quite efficient at breaking trail on those fabulous knee+ deep skintrack powder days! (the skis, like all skis, cry out to be skied downhill in powder)
I love hearing those words ! Congrats on your new trailbreakers. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Charlie Hagedorn
Member
Offline
Posts: 1133
WWW
|
I love hearing those words ! Congrats on your new trailbreakers.
As it turns out, they float well on the down too - kept me cruising on top of a crust that troubled Silas a little yesterday...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you to our sponsors!
|
Contact turns-all-year.com
Turns All Year Trip Reports ©2001-2010 Turns All Year LLC. All Rights Reserved
The opinions expressed in posts are those of the poster and do not necessarily
reflect the opinions of Trip Reports administrators or Turns All Year LLC
|
Turns All Year Trip Reports | Powered by SMF 1.0.6.
© 2001-2005, Lewis Media. All Rights Reserved.
|
Page created in 0.237 seconds with 21 queries.
|
